See. Different aims. This is the right to make words and other sounds with your mouth whether anyone wants to hear you or not. By freedom of speech, I am talking about the encouragement of a range of ideas to be spoken and heard in society. Shouting over speakers prevents this.https://twitter.com/notCursedE/status/971297975086481409 …
OK, I don't. Americans often do. I am referring to a much longer liberal tradition of encouraging the free exchange of ideas for the advance of society. What Rauch calls liberal science. Different countries have different laws around this & they change. Principle remains.pic.twitter.com/La1serXMLk
-
-
Yes, Americans view it differently because 1st Amendment specifically refers to government intervention. That's an important distinction. Protesting a speaker isn't violating their first amendment rights which is why I make the distinction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.