Helen Pluckrose Retweeted ChemicalAgency
I don't agree that free speech is not infringed upon if it is only prevented on one occasion and the ideas exist elsewhere and could be spoken elsewhere. This is a very dangerous idea. One incident of censorship is still an incident of censorship.https://twitter.com/HereInThere/status/971364338517803009 …
Helen Pluckrose added,
ChemicalAgency @HereInThere
Replying to @HPluckrose
Here is my crux https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/971362662394286080 … Exchange of ideas is existential at best but, agreed, is best to have. However, no idea was silenced because 1. the ideas already existed 2. multiple platforms exist 3. it was temporary. No actual free speech was infringed upon.
4:41 AM - 7 Mar 2018
0 replies
5 retweets
13 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.