Ah! Perhaps this is it.Sometimes people think of freedom of speech as the law of their particular country but this is different to the principle,Laws around this only apply to government. I am speaking of individual commitments to advocating & promoting the free exchange of ideashttps://twitter.com/notCursedE/status/971307025773793280 …
-
-
You're missing or at least need to address that there is never unanimous consent and competing ideas often are not filtered on their moral merit. There is an intersection b/w protesting established ideas while offering opposing ones. A battle of neutral ground with fluid rules.
-
Absolutely protest if you feel you must. I'm just saying that to prevent people from speaking is against the principle of free speech.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A lot of people who claim to support freedom of speech are really just opposed to government censorship. Always strikes me as a very limited support.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As Penn Jillette has demonstrated, it is easy to construct counter-scenarios to the "fire in a crowded theatre" scenario. He shouted "fire" in a crowded theatre when there was no danger at all, and everyone remained calmly in their seats. Fatalities: 0. Otherwise, 100% agreed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They were singing 'no platform for fascists' and it is still not a freedom of speech issue but a manners issue?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very Millian.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.