I'm all about the exchange if ideas and formal discussion. 100%. And I'm all about freedom of speech. What you're arguing for is the former, not the latter - but leaning on the latter to make your point is stupid. You don't need to. The former is enough on its own.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/971305124936192000 …
-
-
What you're defending is rational discussion. Which I'm down for. But calling it freedom of speech makes you look dumb all the same. Keep calling it that if you want though I guess... That's your freedom of speech ;)
-
Hard to tell if deliberately obtuse or not... You are describing the 1A. Free speech is a principle that doesn't stop at any nation's borders. It's concerned with communication of individuals, not restrictions on state actions. Value of said speech also not the point.
-
I'm British and don't even know what the 1a is.
-
Then you are deliberately obtuse. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.