Eh. @DavidKlion is wrong. If she was arranged to be there it's kinda bullshit that she was interrupted.
But equally I think you're wrong too. Free speech is a two way street. She has her right to speak freely just as much as they have a right to yell over the top of her.
-
-
No I've acknowledge it and continually keep telling you you are wrong. This isn't about freedom of speech. It's about the rules of formal discussion. Please acknowledge this point or don't reply. Im already so bored and frustrated with this.
-
It's freedom of speech, not freedom of noise. Speech needs to be able to be comprehended to exist. You can't have speech if whenever you talk someone noises you out, but you can never be comprehended. We're reduced to freedom of noise.
-
THEY WERE SAYING WORDS. Jesus why is nobody actually listening to me lmao.
-
Because you’re fucking wrong fam. If you prevent someone from speaking you are taking away their right to speak. How do you not get this?
-
I'm really not.
-
You really are. Preventing people from suppressing free speech is not a suppression of free speech, it’s a defense of it. Put down the bong.
-
This is still not a freedom of speech issue. Nobody was arrested for their speech. It's still just a formal discussion of ideas and rudeness issue. You've not convinced me by being all ad hominem-y
-
Yes it is. Freedom of speech is what this is all about. Nobody was arrested, that would be censorship. Dot get those mixed up. And now it’s about being rude? Come on, how many times are you going to move the goal posts?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.