I don't know what that means. I know we don't always have to look at God according to theological and philosophical assumptions. Don't worry. There are still plenty of books that do if that's all you want. Centuries of them.
-
-
Very serious, as some of history's greatest minds have shown. Have a look at Wheeler's : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment … See if you think it's possible, other than by design.
-
The greatest minds do not necessarily apply their minds to reality. Alchemy isn't real despite Newton thinking it was. I don't know how this is possible. Imagining a designer seems like something a designing species would do. We are necessarily limited in our understanding.
-
Humans are imperfect, including Newton, but still one of the greatest minds ever. Godel (recent) was one of the smartest humans EVER, producing a Proof that is amazing. He was a believer. You'll find smarties on both sides.
-
Which is why it doesn't prove anything. Our intuitions tell us there is a god. Religiosity is pan cultural. My daughter invented one when she was 3. There are some good hypotheses about why we do this but we may never know.
-
Neither side proves anything. :-)
-
That's what I just said! For a long time, the smartest people thought headaches in women were caused by the uterus wandering about.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.