Well, his thing was looking at religious claims from a scientific perspective. But we can't expect people not to talk about their views just coz they have oomph. "No, Oprah, you should not speak of God existing. You are not an expert in religion & have many fans.' Doesn't happen. https://twitter.com/alexsimonelis/status/971204927711309825 …
-
-
1-How do you prove no immed-adj number next to 1.o? By contradiction - happy to show you if you like. 2-How to show God's non-existence? That's a problem for whoever makes that asserion. Onus is always on the asserter, neg or pos.
-
Is the bonus of proof not on the person making the positive claim? But it doesn't matter much. If no-one claims a god to exist, I don't need to question that. If a claim is unfalsifiable, it cannot become a hypothesis.
-
Onus of proof is on the person who makes ANY claim, positive or negative or ... Atheists asserting God's non-existence are not exempt. Don't want to have to prove it? Then don't make that claim.
-
I'll just say it's not a serious proposition until there's some evidence for it. That will do. No need to be claiming to know things that can't be known. When it comes down to more specific religious claims, these can be disproven.
-
Ah, evidence. What I said before: we'll both look at the same facts and claim them as evidence for our opposite beliefs. Take a look at Wheeler's delayed choice experiment and see whether it isn't "magical". Cheers!
-
But God isn't a serious proposition yet. Just say we don't know the causes of everything. It's so easy. You can keep magic as an option, obviously, but I'm voting against it because every mystery solved so far has turned out not to be not magic. (Tim MInchin)
-
Very serious, as some of history's greatest minds have shown. Have a look at Wheeler's : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment … See if you think it's possible, other than by design.
-
The greatest minds do not necessarily apply their minds to reality. Alchemy isn't real despite Newton thinking it was. I don't know how this is possible. Imagining a designer seems like something a designing species would do. We are necessarily limited in our understanding.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.