This is what happens. People insist that the only way to talk about God is the way he's always been talked about - going on theological and philosophical assumptions. If they want to try another way, it must be because they're incapable of doing that.https://twitter.com/SteveMundie/status/971228315477569536 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
But if Dawkins is talking about God as if he were *a* being rather than Being, then he's not even talking about God, at least not the one Christians believe in. He's talking about something totally different, maybe some kind of god like Zeus. It's not a matter of "assumptions."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rongwrong_
God is an assumption and so is 'being' but Dawkins was looking at the scientific claims made by Christianity.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Sorry, I took that tweet you quoted about Dawkins and being/Being at face value. Thought that was the issue you were arguing about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Rongwrong_
Dawkins doesn't address theology, no.
8:34 PM - 6 Mar 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.