This is what happens. People insist that the only way to talk about God is the way he's always been talked about - going on theological and philosophical assumptions. If they want to try another way, it must be because they're incapable of doing that.https://twitter.com/SteveMundie/status/971228315477569536 …
-
-
but there are philosophers who dispute these arguments also, no? it isn't a simple contrast between science -- an evidence-based, rational discourse -- and "assuming God exists."
-
Of course. I particularly like Daniel Dennett, Peter Boghossian and Russell Blackford. I do not at all mean to suggest that science says one thing and philosophy another.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And also: how do you fly in the face of an ASSUMPTION? It's an assumption, for god's sake. "how dare you not take for granted the things that we just, well, take for granted, because that's how our discipline works?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.