-
-
1/2 - I appreciate you taking the time to find this and post it. And the inference about why he'd be upset about this is obvious. I'd be curious to see what PT's response is to this quote. From my understanding he's been dog pilled off twitter, at least for a while. See Picpic.twitter.com/eUflcUKNhU
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gergblives @HPluckrose and
To me, this leads to a different question, "which is to what degree when one decides to become a public figure, does one forfeit the right to privacy?" Particularly, when there's a relevant fact about their life that undermines their position on, say, politics, free speech, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gergblives @HPluckrose and
Zero. Public figures are merely people who others have interest in when that person is in a public square, it doesn’t constitute a “responsibility” to engage with any other individual if they don’t want to, that’s kinda the point of freedom/liberty/liberalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @BrettMoan @HPluckrose and
I don't think that what I said there entails that others have a responsibility to engage with other people. I'm not sure how you're reading that as a logical consequence of what I've said there?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gergblives @HPluckrose and
Sorry reread the thread and realized I had misunderstood PTs posts by his main account and by throwaway accounts he’s made, are all based in this “responsibility to engage if you are a free speech advocate and public speaker” which is just illogical. I see now your question /1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrettMoan @HPluckrose and
In response to the details about the children, which is probably what you referring to in the privacy question. I think most WANT people that privacy for their children, (for security) but it’s likely common for mundane details to be public (like age, school,names, etc)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BrettMoan @HPluckrose and
2/2 Again, my intuitions about the private lives of public figures are mixed/not fully formed - I'm simply asking questions - but given what you've specified here about children and privacy - I'm not sure how PT is releasing hidden 411.pic.twitter.com/fKnkYwYBCo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gergblives @BrettMoan and
I didn't think he got the info off Google. I thought he shared private information that he should have kept to himself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BrettMoan and
Here is a further remark that
@xriskology made regarding this.pic.twitter.com/tlvDVoJmv1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK. Still better if the person stalking you does not speak of your children and how funny it is when you get freaked out when people talk of them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.