When people make arguments that those who advocate freedom of speech must then commit to listening to the speech of everyone else in the world, I realise how much danger we are in of losing touch with the liberal principle of freedom.
-
-
It's hard to understand if you don't realise how much the idea of discourses constructing social reality has been internalised by large segments of society - that the very existence of speech which argues for something they find abhorrent damages society and marginalised groups.
Show this thread -
The idea that speech you don't like could be going on but you don't have to listen to it or that you can argue with it simply isn't enough. Harm is being done by these ideas being spoken. If it can't be stopped, there must be consequences for it.
Show this thread -
They speak of this as though people are being bombarded, wounded by these words and ideas they don't like that are being spoken in a public place whether it's that psychological gender differences exist or that gender is entirely a cultural construct so trans people don't exist.
Show this thread -
(Simplifying there, obv) If you understand that people really see it like this, you'll understand why some see it as equivalent to insist that those people who insisted they had the right to say those hurtful things must now listen to everybody else or be hypocrites.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's not bewildering, it's typical of all extremists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.