Well, you apparently wrote a book decrying social justice without reading seminal works in the theory of social justice, so I'm not going to assume you're versed in the topic.
-
-
Replying to @MJtheProphet @GodDoesnt
You're criticising James for talking about certain topics without having read certain books whilst criticising his book without having read his book? That is not what It's about.
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
I'm on Twitter. He wrote a book. Expected level of research is a bit different.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MJtheProphet @GodDoesnt
You're both on Twitter. Read the book. See the research. Understand why books on social justice not the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
Until you mentioned some others, the only application of his methodology anyone had mentioned was calling social justice activism essentially religious. This stuff doesn't exist in a vacuum, so if he wanted differentiate himself from the Slymepit, he could have, and didn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well spotted. He could have explained the full scope of his work to you personally on Twitter but he didn't. I'm not sure why this seems a remarkable oversight to you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.