Well, you apparently wrote a book decrying social justice without reading seminal works in the theory of social justice, so I'm not going to assume you're versed in the topic.
-
-
Until you mentioned some others, the only application of his methodology anyone had mentioned was calling social justice activism essentially religious. This stuff doesn't exist in a vacuum, so if he wanted differentiate himself from the Slymepit, he could have, and didn't.
-
Well spotted. He could have explained the full scope of his work to you personally on Twitter but he didn't. I'm not sure why this seems a remarkable oversight to you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.