This is not the question. Public figures remain free to decline to engage with any one of their fans or their critics tho they might get criticism if they never engage with any of them. Stalking does not become OK if they decline to do this. https://twitter.com/gregblives/status/971136459674501120 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I always thought Phil was a decent guy who I just disagreed with on stuff. So strange then to see him resort to secondary accounts to avoid blocks and thinking it’s ok to use someone’s children in order to “trigger” them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OnYouLikeGlue
I think he's a decent guy who has a mental illness and it is manifesting in the form of ideologically-zealous obsessive stalking. I very much doubt he can see his behaviour for what it is. It needs to be stopped tho.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That’s the weird thing. I understand how in the moment he may think what he did was justified (heated disagreement), but upon further reflection it should be clear that type of behavior isn’t OK.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
He's not well. He's obsessing about this *all the time*. Stalker mentality is very weird. Kind of get locked into a world of your own warped perception of what is happening. For Phil, I think its a battle of good and evil. That's why it's dangerous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.