Of course. I just don't think science lends itself as well to this as unscientific approaches to understanding the world.https://twitter.com/tmamone/status/970651236897828864 …
-
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I consider myself to be egalitarian too. However, I understand that the realities of evolution are not egalitarian. Regardless, I support natural rights and human rights. Yet, I cannot say that I see this opinion being demonstrated by some of the anti-postmodernists lately.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BarryLyndon34
Well, no. Biology isn't. I'll never be as strong as my husband and he'll never be able to give birth. I don't think anti-postmodernists are a cohesive group. The only person I know who focuses on it as much as me is Jordan Peterson & he's a right winger who doesn't understand it
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That being said, I am confused as to how the Peter Boghossians of the world balance their love of Enlightenment Humanism with their seeming Pragmatism and Darwinian world view.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BarryLyndon34
I don't know what that means. Can you give an example? You're not saying Boghossian is a social Darwinist, surely?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Also, "A scientific world view" has very little to do with the Egalitarianism expressed by many Enlightenment thinkers? "There are biological differences between men and women"......and, so, what?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Huh? Has someone said any of that? What what?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.