Yeah, this isn't the point. The right is far worse than the left. There's just merit to dealing with what you know and getting your own house in order. How much credibility must the left have lost to let Trump get in, ffs. We need to fix this.
-
-
The tension in the article is between good vs bad progress. You seem to think postmodernists want progress of the bad kind, but it isn't clear in your article why it is bad. You think they are wrong about science - though, as I have said, that depends on the postmodernist.
-
Well, I don't think we can make it clearer than that. We already spent 10,000 words on the problem with postmodernism and premodernism. If you still don't see what we are saying it is and why it's bad, I certainly won't be able to explain it on Twitter.
-
And we are only criticising those who are anti-science. Particular postmodern ideas. My friend is a postmodern artist. He is fine with science. No problem there.
-
But that is my problem with your article. What does the moral decision of how to structure society have to do with science? (Also, as i have said repeatedly, not all postmodernists are as anti-science as you say they are).
-
??? Why would the moral decision of how to structure society have anything to do with science? (As I have said repeatedly, I am not claiming all postmodernists are anything and have set out the ideas from postmodernism that I am opposing)
-
Look, I can only link you the essays. I cannot read and understand them for you. With this degree of confusion, I don't think there's any point in talking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.