Oh, for goodness sake. I'll have to disagree with you very strongly here. See the metastudies on this. We must be able to bring biological differences in. Women are not damaged by being presented with biological facts and its demeaning to suggest we are. (I still adore you too)
Yes, but we know that. We couldn't criticise Google for deciding its core values include blank slatism without knowing it did that. What is of interest is why it did that & this is to do with the cultural hegemony of blank slate ideas.
-
-
Philosophically...I agree with you. My personal tendency is to impassive data analysis. Which I know can be annoying and probably unhelpful here. *exits philosophical discussion*
-
Ha! No. Not annoying. Just the difference between what is and what ought to be. I'm much more interested in the latter but reliant on people like you for the former.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.