Why?
-
-
I am less interested in the legal right of businesses to enforce certain views, whether its that women should stay in the secretarial pool or men & women are psychologically identical, than in the cultural norms which make this a dominant view, dissent from which must be punished
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am not defending the specifics of a code of conduct. I was pointing out that, even if stupid or reprehensible, the business decides what its core values are.
-
Yes, but we know that. We couldn't criticise Google for deciding its core values include blank slatism without knowing it did that. What is of interest is why it did that & this is to do with the cultural hegemony of blank slate ideas.
-
Philosophically...I agree with you. My personal tendency is to impassive data analysis. Which I know can be annoying and probably unhelpful here. *exits philosophical discussion*
-
Ha! No. Not annoying. Just the difference between what is and what ought to be. I'm much more interested in the latter but reliant on people like you for the former.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.