So at a minimum I find the email to PB incredibly presumptuous and rude. If it were me, I’d deny it on those grounds alone. /end
-
-
I think Sargon & Anita is a bit apples & oranges v. PT & PB. He attended her panel along with others from the YouTube commentary crowd as a paying attendee of convention. 1/
-
Yes, they sat in the front row but many have made videos since then that they were genuinely interested in hearing what the panel would say. 2/
-
I think some expected there could be controversy and planned to make videos, but none expected that she would use her position of power to call him out and trash him as a human being. 3/
-
He & his friend were making all sorts of connections and networking at VidCon and even reconciling with people they had previously feuded with. 4/
-
Sargon reconciled with Laci Green who he’d also been critical of and apologized to her. She accepted and got trashed for talking to him. 5/
-
I think the main question in that case is whether or making a lot of videos critical of a public figure and then attending a public talk given by them is “harassment”. Whereas what PB is dealing with seems to be an actual stalker. /end
-
At what point does it become harassment though? It seems arbitrary depending on where your allegiances lie.
-
That depends on how you define harassment. As I understand it by legal definitions of harassment, Sargon is not guilty of harassing Anita. Social definitions differ. In PB’s case, it seems from what I’m hearing today that PT may be guilty of legal harassment. 1/
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.