That may be true now, sure. Again - I know nothing and this thing seems off (given it, I'm inclined to accept possibility of bad behaviour I can't see). But here (https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/969624985714216962?s=20 …), it sounds like you accepted the accusation of harassment (a crime) on testimony.
I think this is good enough reason not to respond & engage but I also think you don't need one. Shld just be able to ask people to stop contacting you & they respect this. I've been dealing with someone like this for 18 months now. I don't need to justify wanting to be left alone
-
-
He might be a lovely bloke. He might be right that God exists & that I must understand this. I still don't have to hear him. I've blocked him everywhere, gotten legal advice, ignored online obsessing & if he threatens to turn up at my workplace, I will call the police.
-
There is no problem with PT being very critical of penis hoax & writing abt this. Or being very critical of new atheism & writing abt this. The problem is trying to force individuals to hear it when they've made it clear they want him to leave them alone.
-
You don't need to understand why one person would want another to leave them alone. You just need to accept that they have the right to decline contact with them & call the police if they ignore this & turn up at their workplace. My daughter prosecuted someone for this.
-
If you want to understand why, look at PT's timeline for obsessive & deranged ranting about various people. He has the right to do this but can't blame them for avoiding him & being afraid when he threatens to turn up at their work. This is not normal. It is not OK.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.