You yourself have admitted to be blocked by various people and from certain forums and called them snowflakes for not wanting to talk to you and then posted evidence of yourself threatening to go & sit in the front row of their workplace for two weeks.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @xriskology and
If people are blocking you, ignoring you, asking you to leave them alone, seeking legal advice and threatening to call the police if you approach them in person, consider that your behaviour might be unwanted and threatening. How much clearer does 'No, leave me alone' have to be?
2 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @xriskology and
Where?? Where is this?? Stop just writing and point to instances of this. 1000+ tweets later and you keep repeating this. The best answer is “refer to your twitter feed.” K, thats what you want to get upset, but deafly silent on Krauss right? K, love the burden shifting,awesome
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AtheistAdrian @xriskology and
I don't know anything about Krauss. It's not hard.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @AtheistAdrian and
Doesn't it seem at all a problem that you appear to be using different standards of evidence here? You *believed* (and acted on) things about Phil based on what others told you; but you don't *know* about Krauss (despite at least equivalent evidence), so you withhold *belief*?
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cheomit
No, I'm talking about Phil's email& social media history which are clearly visible to everyone. There's no suggestion someone else did this to set him up. He owns it. He just sees it as OK. Equivalent if Krauss admitted to forcing himself on women but didn't see it as wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
cheomit Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
That may be true now, sure. Again - I know nothing and this thing seems off (given it, I'm inclined to accept possibility of bad behaviour I can't see). But here (https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/969624985714216962?s=20 …), it sounds like you accepted the accusation of harassment (a crime) on testimony.
cheomit added,
Helen Pluckrose @HPluckroseReplying to @HPluckrose @xriskology and 3 othersYou yourself have admitted to be blocked by various people and from certain forums and called them snowflakes for not wanting to talk to you and then posted evidence of yourself threatening to go & sit in the front row of their workplace for two weeks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cheomit @HPluckrose
She's accepting his own admission of harassment, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @CathyYoung63 @cheomit
The disagreement is whether it counts as harassment or not. I don't know if it can be prosecuted in the US. My daughter successfully prosecuted someone who persistently stalked her online & turned up at her work despite her being very clear this was unwanted & frightening.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
He's not denying it. He posted the email saying he was doing it himself and laughed about the fear response - come near me & I will call the police. He defends this. I'm muting you as you are clearly both rude and unreasonable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.