Well, yes, I accept that Phil was blocked by someone and asked to keep away and then that he wrote an email saying that he intends to go & sit in the front row of his classes anyway based on the evidence of him admitting this & posting a photo of the email.https://twitter.com/cheomit/status/970027498242101248 …
-
-
No, I certainly don't know Krauss (or Phil) have done all that's claimed. But we all know knowledge and belief are different. The question is not what we know, but what we're justified in believing is likely. I think we both have evidence for reasonably concluding against both.
-
OK but the examples are not the same. Phil posted the email of himself doing the thing I am criticising him for doing and admitted doing it. If he denied it and said it was made up, this would be different. Krauss denies it and says it is made up.
-
In this case, we'd need to sift the body of evidence and the number of independent accusations and assess for probability beyond reasonable doubt. We just don't have to do that in Phil's case because he admits to doing it & provides the evidence himself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.