Where?? Where is this?? Stop just writing and point to instances of this. 1000+ tweets later and you keep repeating this. The best answer is “refer to your twitter feed.” K, thats what you want to get upset, but deafly silent on Krauss right? K, love the burden shifting,awesome
Hard evidence has been available to me for some time. I have not been at liberty to talk about it. What I responded to publicly was what Phil himself admitted to.
-
-
Sure, your replies have made that clear, but my questions is, was it available since you *first* took the accusations seriously? If yes, my *entire* concern dies on the spot.
-
No, it wasn't. When people I trusted messaged me to warn me against talking to Phil because he did this, I took their warnings seriously because of my knowledge of them as honest people but I did not have evidence they were true and so did not claim to know this.
-
I saw it very soon afterwards in relation to three people. You are confusing believing things from credible people with knowing them to be true, claiming them to be true & expecting society to regard them as true.
-
One of my friends told me she had been raped. I believed her because I know her to be mentally well & honest. I saw the fallout of it for her emotionally. I supported her. I wanted the rapist dead. There wasn't sufficient evidence to prosecute & I fantasised abt killing him.
-
I understood on a visceral level then why some people get so passionate about always believing the victim. She did herself for a while. It remains necessary to require evidence & due process to claim something to be true, Because personal conviction of truth is not enough
-
100% agree. I've had a similar experience. But that's why I wouldn't say most claims against Krauss (or Phil, from my end) *are* true; they're just credible enough to deserve taking quite seriously.
-
Well, I don't know what to say to you then. He posted the email and admitted to having written it and to knowing that Peter did not want any contact with him. He defended doing so. I don't see any grounds for claiming this has not been established to be true.
-
No, that part is clear. I mean, I lack all the earlier, more detailed (perhaps even more damning) evidence that you've pointed to in support of your criticisms of him. Sorry for being unclear.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.