BREAKING: #lawrencekrauss is actually the one "under assault."pic.twitter.com/jG6UqqWyVY
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Helen: You make several significant claims that are factually false. If this weren’t Twitter, I’d simply refute them point by point. For the nonce, could you substantiate any of your claims in the tweet below?pic.twitter.com/U7aJq0cSq5
I can't provide evidence of you emailing people insisting they respond to you about, say, penis hoaxes, no, because I don't have those emails. The evidence of you obsessing abt the same few ppl is all over your social media accounts. 1/2
You yourself have admitted to be blocked by various people and from certain forums and called them snowflakes for not wanting to talk to you and then posted evidence of yourself threatening to go & sit in the front row of their workplace for two weeks.
If people are blocking you, ignoring you, asking you to leave them alone, seeking legal advice and threatening to call the police if you approach them in person, consider that your behaviour might be unwanted and threatening. How much clearer does 'No, leave me alone' have to be?
Where?? Where is this?? Stop just writing and point to instances of this. 1000+ tweets later and you keep repeating this. The best answer is “refer to your twitter feed.” K, thats what you want to get upset, but deafly silent on Krauss right? K, love the burden shifting,awesome
I don't know anything about Krauss. It's not hard.
Doesn't it seem at all a problem that you appear to be using different standards of evidence here? You *believed* (and acted on) things about Phil based on what others told you; but you don't *know* about Krauss (despite at least equivalent evidence), so you withhold *belief*?
No, I'm talking about Phil's email& social media history which are clearly visible to everyone. There's no suggestion someone else did this to set him up. He owns it. He just sees it as OK. Equivalent if Krauss admitted to forcing himself on women but didn't see it as wrong.
Ok, well Phil, then you just respond the same way. I dont know if theyre true or not. Handwave inconvenient accusations away it’s all the legit skeptics and centerlords are doing nowadays especially the real “egalitarians”
Huh? I hope he would respond the same way to being asked whether accusations are true or not when he doesn't know whether accusations are true or not.
Obv, if I knew Krauss to be consistently stalking people online despite blocks & explicit requests to stop & even legal letters and then saw him threaten to actually come to their place of work & then call them snowflakes for saying they'll call the police if he goes near them...
Helen, please think about what you're writing. If I were to tell you, right now, that if you come near me, I'm going to call the police, you would (reasonably) reply: "What are you some kind of snowflake who can't be confronted by someone who disagrees with you?" :-)
No, I'd say of course I wouldn't come near you if you asked me not to & then ask what I'd done to make you have that response. If it were that I had obsessed abt you publicly for months getting increasingly deranged, emailed you & caused you to block me & seek legal advice...
.. and done this so unrelentingly (as well as other dishonest character assassination attempts which you will know cannot be discussed publicly for legal reasons) that it caused you to threaten me with the police, do you know what I'd do? Stop.
No partisanship. I can think what Phil is admitting to doing is wrong without this being related to anything else. Judge Krauss all you want. He is irrelevant to whether or not Phil's behaviour is acceptable.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.