Not missing out. Just don't feel the need to call those things "deep connections" or "love" (or "profound" as another person said). This is really a discernment/perfectionism/standards issue. Like how some people feel the need to toss around the word "friend" for "acquaintances".
-
-
-
I don't understand what you don't understand about deeply loving friends or having deep connections with them. You can have a deep connection with a best friend and love them to the point they almost become family.
-
And yet, "loving as family" or "loving as a friend" is still on a different plane of values and intensity as "sexual, romantic love". Which is why is saying the latter counts as much more deep is not in any way an indication of lack of depth. Just a difference of values.
-
I don't think love with a sexual element is necessarily more deep, but it's different.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't understand why this is so hard for him to understand.
-
Not sure if he truly doesn't understand because he's never experienced it himself or if he's nitpicking over semantics.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.