I'm not annoyed that such people exist. I feel pity for them because they'll only ever be able to experience closeness and connection in a sexual/romantic context & this necessarily limits the relationships that will enrich their lives. https://twitter.com/Aim2Reason/status/967622574288003072 …
-
-
I can also feel sorry for people who are limited sexually. This doesn't really relate to being able to have close bonds that aren't sexual.
-
(1/2)My reference, while possibly not a proper reflection of
@DM_Berger's point, stems from this thought experiment: https://twitter.com/DM_Berger/status/967593259282255874 … If 'people who have trouble comprehending...lack emotional depth', then a pansexual/polyamarous can claim hetero./monog. can claim our -
incapacity to experience these preferences limits our depth; as a pansexual has more options for deeper depth, and polyamarous can experience more aggregate depth. Helen, I butchered this w/ typos and incomprehensible construction. Let me know if I should take another pass? ;P
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.