You are back to talking sense again! 
-
-
-
Did I stop?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But if you reject people for physical reasons then you're a bigot! That includes the wrong set of genitalia evidently.
-
This is about depth in relationships and wether they can or can not be as meaningful without sex.
-
But honestly love is what world needs more of sis.pic.twitter.com/A3oRaB0sKu
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Age 68, I discovered the (somewhat judgmental) word demisexual. Oh, I want something more than mechanics. Explains much in my life...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gotta say Helen, the arguments you're arguing against make no sense at all to me. You're absolutely right that one can have deep, loving relationships with the opposite sex without sex ever having been on the menu. I've had a few of them. Who can argue with that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That horse is a pink gelatinous puddle by now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Evolution is a progression.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again, move away from the main point about "deep connection" and "love". Some people don't feel the need to call so many of their relationships "deep" or "love". Is this really not clear to some people?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.