Ah, but see, this is silly, sex is not just flesh intersection (unless it is shitty sex). Sex is much more than that, and opens up parts of yourself and the other in ways that are often impossible otherwise. I.e. there are depths of connection that can *only* be reached via sex.
-
-
-
Granted, but not every meaningful or deep connection requires *that* level of depth

-
You can have a *deep* connection with your Mum as well. 1/
-
I agree with Derek that there are unique "depths" that only a loving sexual connection can explore. There are other depths that a loving, communicative, asexual relationship can explore. They are not mutually exclusive but neither can the one compensate for the other. 2/2
-
This is well said
@KevinOnEarth. The point being that someone is not "shallow" simply because they think both dimensions are necessary for a truly deep connection. They might just have stricter standards about what they call a "deep" connection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.