If you're ever tempted to think people overstate the power of postmodern ideas of knowledge, truth, power & identity because so few people have studied these, think of how much influence Christianity & Islam etc can have in a culture where only a tiny % of ppl study theology.
-
-
Because they believed that knowledge and truth were constructed by power and that people are situated within this by their position in society determined by their identity, the solution was to demote dominant ideas & elevate marginalised ones. Make everything equal.
Show this thread -
But this does necessarily require abandoning the idea that objective truth exists and that some moral value systems are better than others.
Show this thread -
It's quite possible to recognise that some truth claims & moral claims have been excluded from the conversation & remedy this but still evaluate both according to evidence, reason & consistently liberal humanist ethics.
Show this thread -
The problem is not that some ideas get marginalised but that they get marginalised for the wrong reason. Rejecting an idea because of the gender/race/sexuality of the person/people expressing it is a problem. Rejecting an idea because it has no evidence and/or is unethical is not
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The
#IsOughtProblem strikes again.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.