The liberal humanist feminists aren't the problem. The intersectionals are. They are the ones who attack liberal humanists generally and insist we are right wing & if feminist 'white feminists' & write think pieces about the rampant sexism & racism in the 'humanist community'https://twitter.com/Objekat_505/status/961961896776790016 …
-
-
I thought I was a feminist, until I went to university, met the feminists there, and read a bunch of feminist writings from the 70s and 80s in a philosophy class. Then I backed slowly away... I like both women and men too well to do to them what modern feminism is doing to them.
-
But, that said, if the Helen Pluckroses, Christina Hoff Sommerses, and Camille Paglias of the world were representative of more of modern feminism, I'd be down with it.
-
Camille’s branch of feminism is the only branch I could ever see myself roosting on.
-
I loved it when she told JPeterson PoMo’s weren’t outgrowths of radical leftists on campus in the 60’s. She said they left to join communes or died on acid trips. JP didn’t bat an eye. I think she said PoMos were ahistorical bourgeoisie.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is pretty sold challenge to humanism, from almost feminist humanistic perspective and it's done without any reference to postmodernism:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/27/the-root-of-all-cruelty?mbid=social_facebook …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
intersectionality = obsession with division = bad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.