No, its not. It's based in evolution. Have you noticed how men who are married or don't want to have sex with women still strive for status and wealth even tho that behaviour is related to attracting women?
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @CricketBane
From evolutionary stance status and wealth offer offspring a better chance of survival. But they are tangible benefits in and of themselves. Comparing their acquisition to wearing make up is a false equivalency
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thegiant4444 @CricketBane
Talking about things people do to attract mates. Obviously everyone wants to have a nice lifestyle and look healthy/attractive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CricketBane
Yeah, and obtaining wealth and status doesnt fall into that category as simply as wearing nice clothes, doing your hair or wearing make up does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thegiant4444 @CricketBane
Well, I can't be bothered to argue about it. David Buss is good on differences in drives to obtain & display resources & drives to present youth & beauty in terms of intrasexual competition. They're underlying drivers which don't tell us much abt the individual's motivation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, no. These are different aspects.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.