And I have written much about the problem with these definitions. However, I have defined what I mean by harassment and this is what I am talking about right now so there is no point arguing with me using any other definition because that is not what I am talking about. https://twitter.com/PrudeDogg/status/961805063101599744 …
What? Who? I am making a point about harassment. Other people almost certainly have different definitions which is why I defined what I am talking about so clearly.
-
-
This whole lipstick thing isn't based off of Peterson's comments on harassment and makeup in the workplace? Because if not, that's a massive coincidence, and I apologize for misreading.
-
A very long time ago! I've moved on from that and addressed about a dozen views on this since.
-
My bad then. I've been seeing your tweets retweeted by people who are very much still on that topic, and have been a bit annoyed by how many people have been pretty dishonest about what was said. About to unfollow a few people.
-
I said this on Peterson. https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/961781177484005376 … Then I got a load of people with a variety of views including 'women should make men more comfortable by not wearing make-up' and 'men over-infer sexual interest so make-up is risky'.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.