So therefore negative attention (as you so demurely call having your boobs or butt grabbed and groped) is A-OK? This is a stupid argument.
-
-
Thats not an equivalent argument. When people show off their gold or leave their door open and get robbed, a lot of people say "should have locked the door or you shouldnt have been showing off" this isnt victim blaming its telling the individual what to do
-
Yes, it is. We all know that some people will try to take what they want from other people. Whether or not it's ok to tell people how to avoid this is another matter. You should be able to wear lipstick or a Rolex to work without getting harassed or robbed.
-
No, it isn't victim-blaming. These exchanges are so tiring. A: "X increases Y. Reducing X could help reduce Y" B: "We should be allowed to do X without Y." A: "I agree. But the reality is X increases Y". B: "You're victim-blaming anyone who does X". B is acting in bad faith.
-
Looking good for work gives a woman(or a man) a huge payoff in how her competency is evaluated. It probably has an infinitesimal relation to whether she will be sexually harassed. So that's why the whole argument is ridiculous.
-
Yes, postulating that the increasingly sexualized self-presentation of modern women and the growing panic over sexual harassment in the workplace is unrelated is totally ridiculous...
-
LOLOL.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Feminists think anytime you tell women how to protect themselves which include the fact that rape happens due to sexual interest which means scantily clad clothes could attract a heinous person, we cant get anywhere in this debate if you think the victim hae no agency
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.