It is difficult because it seems a line does need to be drawn somewhere between the burqa and public naked sex & that will always be, to some extent, arbitrary. There is no factual line. This genuinely is a social construct. We have to argue for where we think it should be & whyhttps://twitter.com/mlowry/status/960119315365326848 …
The scale is 'modesty' in relation to concepts of sexual appropriateness.
-
-
Is a naked human immodest or sexual? Or is it just what it is? A naked human like we all are? Modesty is a judgement and I'm a bit sad that you have decided to judge as to what is modest and what is not? Who gave you that right to decide what is modest?
-
It was you who said 'No public sex because people have morals', not me. Your line is obviously where sexuality is concerned. OK, mine probably is too. But this is still largely arbitrary. Sex is natural. The other animals don't worry. Can't rationalise it.
-
Why do you always miss the point and get antagonistic about it? It's beyond tiresome. I really have had enough now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.