Though I wonder if it is correct to assume that the old-fashioned way implies testing it for truth by 'using it' though? ;)
Yes, this just interested me because it seems to imply that sometimes people write critical pieces by accident but, in fact, I can't think of a scenario in which that could happen. The writer has to make an argument. The editor has to understand it. They know what they're doing.
-
-
Ah! Critical pieces certainly do not happen by accident, but critical pieces can come across as hatchet-jobs, even if unintended. And that is what bothered me. Maybe I'm too sensitive to bias? :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be like me saying I had the sense that you are now tweeting deliberately. Of course you are. If you'd sat on your phone or something, it would be nonsense.
-
Funny as this is, you know that this is not it. I felt the balance was off, though it - ostensibly - could not have been. And, to me, that came from the disproportionate weight that the f-t-p-q angle carries. Is that JBP's intent or a spandrel? And should it be used to criticize?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.