It's fine to say ideas are wrong, and that people are wrong for expressing them, but if you don't attempt to explain WHY they're wrong, it's not really criticism it's just character assasination. Perhaps, as you say in the other response, he's written well & extensively about
Another different claim. First he wrong for thinking Peterson was wrong. Now he is wrong for not acknowledging he thinks Peterson is wrong. This is really silly. You are all over the place and keep changing what the problem is. You just want to have a problem for some reason.
-
-
I never said he was wrong for thinking Peterson was wrong. You interpreted me that way a number of times, but I didn't say it. I know this because I don't actually think it's true--disagreement is fine, which I did say. I don't know why we're not communicating, and I don't know
-
how to phrase it any more clearly so perhaps we've reached an impasse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.