No. He meant what he was very careful to say.
I don't know why you think the philosophical ideas haven't been considered. James has written several books on religion and psychology & epistemology & been published in philosophy journals on the subject. He has considered whether such ideas are legitimate. It's OK to think not.
-
-
But this one doesn't look at Peterson's epistemology, no. It looks at the movement arising around him and the psychology underlying it - the alienation by feminism, the worthlessness of various countermovements like MRM etc & Peterson's appeal in the middle of this.
-
You can certainly think he (and Murray) made a bad argument about the psychological draw of this stuff. Me too. I wrote this. But that doesn't make it bad faith.pic.twitter.com/P2y8CBsrKL
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.