Yes, I'm always annoyed when forced to defend Peterson. Also annoyed when I'm accused of being tribal and having a problem with him coz I'm a leftie & support trans identity when I actually agree with him on the free speech issues round that.
Yeah, I heard this. I agree generally that people should be able to use the language they choose but I don't know how accurate his representation of Canadian law is.
-
-
It's very very inaccurate. As the actual law has been around since 1990 with zero examples matching his horror stories, it's also demonstrably false. C16 just adds trans to "male, female, black, gay, disabled, etc etc". And thats it in total
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His claims are around "unintended interactions" between laws. Again, proven false by over a year of C16 being law. Logicked destroys petersons claims in detail after around 24mins herehttps://youtu.be/Jd95T66YjSQ
-
And this is pretty much Jordan's strategy in a nutshell. Pick a thorny subject, throw out some alarmist but sufficiently vague claims. Back them up with arguments about the "unknown" aspects. It's cult 101 fear driven recruitment
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.