My biggest single issue with Peterson is that his points around transgender and free speech issues are a massive fabrication and work of fiction, with zero basis in the laws he cites as being oppressive. But it plays well to the peanut stalls
-
-
-
Yeah, I heard this. I agree generally that people should be able to use the language they choose but I don't know how accurate his representation of Canadian law is.
-
It's very very inaccurate. As the actual law has been around since 1990 with zero examples matching his horror stories, it's also demonstrably false. C16 just adds trans to "male, female, black, gay, disabled, etc etc". And thats it in total
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.