This is why I only use Twitter to comment on Peterson, his supporters are an enamoured of wordy diatribes to obfuscate and distract as he is. He is Barnum, or Chopra, or Koresh, or Moon
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I didn't say it was why, I said they are. Why, is because a competent wordsmith peddling easy answers, peppered with grains of truth and appeals to their victim status, is a heady brew of intoxication.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yes, exactly. This is what gurus do. They speak to people's needs and make them feel special and purposeful.
-
Hm, you and
@GodDoesnt seem to have a bit of a hang-up on JBP, with this guru/cult talk, and going on about "young men". I'm 52 and married, and I really like him. I know several my age (inc, 2 women) how adores him. But he's no guru. We don't even agree w. everything he says. -
Good solid argument. Thanks.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't this Lewis' law?http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Lewis%27_Law …
-
No. That's any comment. James made this point about feminism recently. Saying that comments which support the thesis of an essay do that is just true.
-
Eg: Essay saying French people like garlic. Comment: actually many French people don't. OMG, that just proves my point. = Lewis Law. Comment: Yes, I'm French & garlic is wonderful. That continues my essay. =James
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Now all I can think of is Michael York playing Peterson.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't wait to 2400 to pray before a lobster altar.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.