This is an unpopular view among my fellow liberals but think twice before assuming a pro-lifer is anti female sexual freedom. They may be but there is also an intuitive objection to abortion which is on the very liberal care/harm foundation. Note I said 'intuitive', not rational.
I disagree for the reasons I gave. Asserting the opposite isn't much good. Give a reason why you disagree.
-
-
Demanding control of another woman's body, using laws and legal consequence that will leave a pregnant woman with less bodily autonomy than a corpse is the deepest way to rob her of freedom. If you're anti abortion and act on that only by not having one would be the exception.
-
But we're talking about motivations for opposing abortion. Whether its because you want to control women's sexuality or because you think of embryos as babies and motivated by a misguided protective empathy.
-
As long as your "reasons" only apply to you. We do not accept misguided protective empathy for scientific fact when we are talking about public health and a persons right to control the use of their own body. People in America are free to do things others think are wrong.
-
This again is a different argument to motivations. I am talking about motivations and you entered the conversation by saying the motivation was to control women's sexuality.
-
Also, not everybody on the internet is in America.
-
also true, I am seeing through a paradigm of being where I am.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.