Well, no. People who don't accept trans women as women, call them transwomen - a noun different to 'women'. People who do call them 'trans women' - trans being an adjective to describe a woman, like 'black woman.'
You are missing the point. What told him he was male? He had a vagina and his family told him he was a girl. *Other biological indicators of sex* made him know he was male. Biologists have found these indicators in trans people supporting their sense of their own gender.
-
-
We are not Male or Female based on 'who told us' or what we are told. As you say, his biology made him male. What he was told didn't change the fact. You're still ducking the point that to be a 'trans woman' you MUST be a male. A woman cannot be a 'trans woman'.
-
This is my point. We can't tell people what they are. How did he know what sex he was? It wasn't because he had a penis. I'm not ducking it. I'm pointing out that trans women have biological indicators of maleness. How do you define male?
-
I can't keep explaining this over and over again. You've already said that someone without a penis can be a man so you acknowledge that other biological indicators exist. Do you need evidence that trans women have them?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.