If that's how you define 'cultural marxism', sure, but it;s unclear why that is the definition when it so different to Marxism and Marxists hate it so much.
Yes. The revolutionary aspect has moved on from class issues (Marxism) to identity & language issues (postmodernism)
-
-
'Marxism' is not synonymous with 'dismantling perceived structural oppression' or with 'revolution'. That drive can be targeted at anything from slavery to patriarchy to feudalism to theocracy to liberalism. Marxism did it with class.
-
If Marxism abandons class issues, it's not Marxism. In the same way, if feminism abandoned women's rights, it just wouldn't be feminism. And if vegetarians start eating meat, they're no longer vegetarians. This isn't a no true scotsman. Those words mean something.
-
You can make perfectly reasonable and well-evidenced arguments that a movement or political position which used to focus on one thing then began focusing on something else whilst retaining its ethos but this is different to saying it still is that thing.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Right. but didn't you say postmodernism isn't cultural marxism?
-
Yes. For the reasons I gave above. It doesn't focus on class issues & Marxism is about class issues.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.