Yes, to this thread. It's very worrying. https://twitter.com/GodDoesnt/status/954425472447864832 …
-
-
This is Rupaul as well Helen.
-
Quite possibly but do you see why Peterson is of more interest to someone who talks about postmodernism, liberalism, gender relations and freedom of speech than Rupaul? It's not bias to address methods of ppl tackling the same issues as me rather than completely different ones.
-
No, I get it, academically it makes sense. I just don't think the cult argument should be included because that's more cultural than academic.
-
But I am arguing about culture. How these things are affecting culture. How and why Peterson is so popular in the current climate. What he is bringing to the polarisation. How we can fulfil the same needs without trad gender roles and pragmatic notions of truth.
-
It'll be interesting to read. My suspicion is that people follow him bc they understand liberalism has failed but they don't know why. Attraction to pragmatism is a symptom of that failure, and like the MAGA crowd, people know it used to be better for them but they don't know why
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can I read the rest of this somewhere?
-
Here. Also a video with a little extra commentary and much more stuttering.https://areomagazine.com/2017/12/08/the-problem-with-truth-and-reason-in-a-post-truth-society/ …
-
Thanks, I enjoyed both reading and listening to that. Also you didn't stutter all that much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So I was reading this, and about halfway I thought: 'Noooo, Helen isn't falling for this Jungian archetype bs, is she?!' and then it all turned out to be ok. Ffffiiiew
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.