A little surprised at both of your responses to @aktivarum. Seems like he's just someone who is passionate about certain subjects. He was pointing out errors in the original thread. Is that off limits now? I see no need for mocking and ad hominem.
-
-
-
I must have missed that bit. I just saw inexplicable ranting, suggesting James would delete his observations and comparing him to that Newman person. I've no idea what his point was but when someone does that, little motivation to find out,
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"What are some of your hobbies?" "Mostly just being obsessively crazy on twitter to make my points seem less rational"
-
""What are some of your hobbies?"" Cathy Newman/James Lindsay: Ranting endlessly about gender imbalances while being totally uninterested in learning the facts on gender imbalances There you go.,
-
??? Go have a cup of tea and a lie down.
-
I get it...the tea is added punishment to the time out.
-
I get it ... Its easier to ignore argument than respond to them. It didnt work for Cathy Newman because she was not on twitter.
-
Haha...who are you even talking to? Everyone?
-
Hardly everyone. I see three persons in the mentions either talking to me or about me or things I said. So the answer would be three persons.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
