Look back through our timelines where we talk about how his views mirror postmodernism and oppose Enoightenment values in the same way. Includes extracts of his books.
Would you please read my timeline. I've already been through this for an hour and don't want to repeat myself. It's all there,
-
-
No. This stance is what Peterson and the postmodernists have in common and that was the point being denied earlier.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Then go away. If you accept they both reject the objectivity of truth but don't think it matters, I can't be bothered to try to persuade you it should right now. My point was that they do & you have confirmed this in your own stance which you share with them.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I don't. I think one is truth and the other interpretation.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I've sent you an explanation.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, I'm not accepting different kinds of true. There is truth and there is emotionally resonant narratives, and there are useful beliefs which may or may not be true and there are ethical arguments.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Because it matters what is true. This blurring by Peterson or by postmodernists is contributing to our current post-truth problem. I gave two talks about this recently & will find them if you wish,
-
Tweet unavailable
-
This is my argument for why he is. I can't put it better than that,https://areomagazine.com/2017/12/08/the-problem-with-truth-and-reason-in-a-post-truth-society/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.