JP did a poor job of explaining his position on this during the first Sam Harris interview; he’s cleared it up fairly well at this point. Does not deny the existence of factual truth but posits existence of meta truths, something more along the likes of Jung’s archetypal truths
-
-
-
So he denies the objectivity of truth because things can be true whether they are objectively true or not. This is typical of postmodernism,
-
The first thing I said after listening to the Sam Harris interview, it's just as postmodern as the SJW's. It's just that it's meninism-light, sprinkled in w some good 'ol trad gender roles and christianity.
-
You get it. Why is so hard for so many other astute and reasonable people?
-
To be fair he's pretty good at the gender pay gap and also free speech. He's got an massive presence on YouTube, that's where you reach the millenials.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The "purpose of humanity"? What an utterly abhorrent, inconceivably arrogant viewpoint. To believe that humanity matters so much that FACTS should alter themselves to appease our purpose... that has to border on some kind of insanity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A political pragmatist sees subjective and prescriptive claims, either purely on their own or tied to interpretive facts, as true only in-so-far as the ideas are productive. Otherwise, the claim is near truth, but is missing something
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The JP-defence, postmodern horse shoe string theory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Remember when there was no truth during the time of dinosaurs?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.