Well, no. Then you'd have to keep getting married and divorced unless you only wanted to have sex with one person for your entire life. I think most women would prefer unwanted advances that having that expectation on them. You know, because of the wanted ones. https://twitter.com/YeyoZa/status/953266858337144832 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
The lunch comparison doesn't work for me. Apples and oranges. That said, I remember when no was the default and it's true that it made things easier. It also comes with unwanted baggage./1
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ireneogrizek
I think it is for most people but not for that woman and not for me. She clearly saw both as something that could be a pleasure or a form of social networking which can be tedious. That's a valid take.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ireneogrizek
Having lunch when you don’t want to doesn’t have the possibility of leading to things like unwanted pregnancies & STDs. That’s why the comparison doesn’t work for me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But that's a consequence of sex whether wanted or not. Not talking about rape. Talking about social networking or being liked rather than desire as motivation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.