Well, no. Then you'd have to keep getting married and divorced unless you only wanted to have sex with one person for your entire life. I think most women would prefer unwanted advances that having that expectation on them. You know, because of the wanted ones. https://twitter.com/YeyoZa/status/953266858337144832 …
-
-
Whilst it is probably true that premarital sex becoming unexceptional leads to women who don't want to have it finding themselves asked to explain it more than when it was assumed good girls didn't, the solution is not to return to this understanding of morality.
Show this thread -
Women do have agency. They can explain things. Or decline to explain things and just state wishes. If this means that they lose a connection, it probably wasn't worth keeping. If they think sex is a fair enough price to pay for keeping it, they can decide that too.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Having sex obviously more emotionally fraught than having lunch. Only comparable in sense of obligation, not in impact. Didn't read the article as advocating for a return to no premarital sex but maybe I missed something
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.