Science survives. The knowledge it produces is provisional, constantly corrected & updated.
Pretty great, yes. We don't know how much depression, and eating disorder there was in times past coz society didn't recognise it. Addiction is as new as the things to be addicted to. Violence is at an all time low. Would you like to have lived in medieval times?
-
-
Yes and no. I don't buy the idea that these maladies are as old as the hills, but we're never gonna settle that on Twitter. Addiction in the Ancient World, yes - opoid *epidemics*, no. The violence statistics are also a minefield.
-
Well no, limited opioids. You think depression is new? Maybe, to some extent. People had to keep going in the past and that helps. Sympathy for sufferers is quite new. Violence has clearly decreased tho. See Pinker.
-
I meant epidemics - limited epidemics, but I really don't think we can settle any of these examples on Twitter
-
Epidemics of what. I find I'm not getting your point.
-
Drug use. I accept there are drunkards around in Greek myths and medieval tales, but not massive epidemics of addiction.
-
I don't know enough about this period to say but it seems likely more drugs are in existence and accessible now.
-
Goodnight, Jacob. Thanks for the chat.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To get back to what we began with, my article was really focused on a missappropriation of Kant, not by you, and I was defending Kant (so modernity, kind of), as someone who didn't lapse into elitism. When I read today's classical liberals, I'm often frustrated by...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.